Guest Spot

The Next Layer of AI Infrastructure: Memory for Agentic Systems

The Next Layer of AI Infrastructure: Memory for Agentic Systems

The next layer of AI infrastructure, memory for agentic systems, builds intelligence that learns, adapts, and acts with context and continuity.

AI is moving from narrow, prompt-and-response tools to agentic systems – software that can reason, adapt, and act with autonomy. Yet many of today’s databases were never designed for this shift –  still assuming a world of static records and stateless calls. We shovel facts into databases, then force models to re-query them endlessly, reconstructing context from scratch. The result: latency, cost, and brittle behaviour that limits what AI can do at scale.

The next layer of AI infrastructure – memory – changes that. Memory systems store, retrieve, and contextualise knowledge in real time so agents can carry forward what they learn. Think of it as moving from a filing cabinet to a living knowledge substrate: short-term working context, long-term facts, and episodic histories that evolve with every interaction.

From storage to memory: three capabilities

Leaders evaluating “AI memory” should look for three interlocking capabilities:

  • Persistence for evolving knowledge. Not just rows in tables, but episodes (what happened), semantic facts (what is true), and state (what’s current). Practically, this favours multi-model data: document for flexibility, graph for relationships, and vector indexes for semantic similarity – under a single identity model and timeline.
  • Retrieval that blends symbolic and semantic. Agents need to recall “the last three incidents for this customer” (symbolic filters, time windows) and “anything like this error” (semantic search). Best-in-class systems combine vector retrieval with structured predicates, ranking, and reranking to deliver compact, trustworthy context windows.
  • Context management. Memory isn’t a dump; it’s curated. That means summarisation and compaction, deduplication, conflict resolution, and provenance so you can explain why the agent believed something. It also means forgetting: TTLs (time-to-live, that is the amount of time data should remain valid and available), decay policies, and redaction to comply with privacy and right-to-erasure obligations.

These principles have guided how we think about the boundary between database and AI runtime: keep memory close to the data, queryable in real time, and governable.

Architecture patterns that work

Agent memory benefits from a multi-model core: a unified store where records can be documents, connected via graph edges, and indexed as vectors – without ETL gymnastics. The graph captures who relates to what; vectors capture what’s similar; documents capture what’s true now.

Agents react to change. Real-time events – event streams, change feeds, or live queries – let memory update instantly (“payment failed → open a case → notify the agent”) and keep working context warm.

Memory will cross PII, contracts, and operational data. You’ll need fine-grained access control (down to record or field), auditing, lineage/provenance, and data residency controls. Treat these as non-negotiable requirements rather than afterthoughts – policy and governance by design.

If you can’t observe or measure memory, you can’t manage it. Track memory hit rate(how often retrieved context is used), context trust scores (provenance/recency/consistency), task success and latency budgets (milliseconds spent in retrieval vs. generation). And build guardrails to alert on drift or conflicting memories.

And finally, two pragmatic rules: (1) co-locate compute and data to reduce egress and latency; (2) adopt tiered memory – ephemeral cache for short-term, hot storage for active episodes, cold storage for archives. This keeps inference snappy without runaway spend. 

What this means for your data strategy

  • Inventory candidate use cases. Start where memory obviously compounds value – customer support agents, incident response, sales ops, and supply chain planning. These domains have rich histories and repetitive decision loops.
  • Establish your data contract. Define the canonical entities (customer, asset, incident), identity resolution rules, and retention policies. Decide what the agent is allowed to remember, for how long, and under what legal basis.
  • Design the memory schema. Model episodes (time-stamped events), facts (normalised truths), and summaries (rolling context). Index what you’ll retrieve semantically (docs, tickets, logs) and link it in a graph so agents can reason over relationships.
  • Close the loop. Capture outcomes (“action taken,” “result,” “user override”) back into memory. This creates a reinforcement cycle – your agents don’t just act; they learn operationally.
  • Bake in governance. Implement role-based or attribute-based access, audit trails, and residency controls from day one. Set redaction and TTL policies; make “forgetting” testable.
  • Instrument relentlessly. Monitor memory KPIs alongside business metrics. When performance drifts, use provenance to debug the context stack, not just the model.

A near-term picture of “good”

Within 6 to 12 months, many enterprises can stand up agents that: remember customer preferences across channels; summarise each new interaction into a compact, retrievable episode; automatically reference relevant contracts and prior incidents; and take constrained actions with full auditability. Leaders should expect to see shorter handle times, higher first-contact resolution, fewer escalations, and clearer lines of accountability when the agent gets it wrong.

Why this evolution matters

LLMs (large language models) gave us fluent reasoning. Memory makes it usable at scale. When agents carry forward context, they become cheaper (fewer tokens, less re-query), faster (less orchestration), and more reliable (traceable provenance). Most importantly, they become organisationally aligned: decisions reflect your history, your policies, your customers.

At SurrealDB, we’ve seen that the most successful teams don’t chase novelty – they re-architect around memory. They treat it as a first-class layer of the stack, not an add-on library. For leaders, the mandate is clear: put memory at the centre of your AI strategy, with the same rigour you apply to security and data quality. That’s how you unlock the next generation of enterprise intelligence – agents that don’t just answer, but remember, learn, and act in service of your business.

Discover the latest trends and insights—explore the Business Insights Journal for up-to-date strategies and industry breakthroughs!

Related posts

How U.S. Businesses Are Managing The Hidden Cost of Big Tech’s New Playbook

Jon Winsett

How Insurers Are Unlocking Competitive Advantage with AI, With a Crucial Role for MGAs  

Adrian Coupland

Why Wellness Is The Secret To Better Attendee Engagement

Katie Moser Stuck